[JJ_SO]

Those not seeing Fuji's green band problem should immediately book an eye test at "Spec Savers"     :wacko:

 

You're not expecting me to ran into a couple of hours Fuji test research? So far I'm not aware of the "well documented Fuji green band problem" as well as I'm not seeing loads of red band problems for Nikon or Pentax. My last eye test was a couple of weeks ago. Yours? 

 

So those not seeing the problem might be not seeking specific problems. And those seeing it shouldn't just only talk about but post a link to problem pictures or some samples itself. Should be easy if it's that obvious...

 

Edit: Doing a Google search for "Fuji green problem" tells me lots about tea. "Fuji green band" leads to a couple of music videos. "nikon sensor problem" gives me immediately insight in all dusty oily unwanted additional features. So, "well documented" is a little bit a mouthful... 

 

Besides, buying a Fuji mirrorless to document the foliage of distant green leaves is not my top priority. Getting excellent skin tones may be a couple of topics higher in my list.

 

Edit2: Just didn't see one DPReview thread amongst the tea stuff. So, I saw something (and of course don't know if that's what you mean, but the picture is all green and all foliage and lawn and leaves).

 

So, it's about out of camera JPGs lacking on detail? If I'm into this mirrorless system, I can promise, it's not for JPG-output. I'm also not thinking to get the best amount of details from an APS-C sensor. For landscape I'm already happy with the output of Sigma Merrill of Nikon FF.

 

It looks like the "problem" is more if someone uses RAW and knows how to handle the conversion. If anything, Baobob's version of the picture looks a bit too detailed to me but as long as I can't compare the print I have to suspect that might be the way to go. Or not.

 

So, I'm sorry, dave's clichés and AiryDiscus, I'm out of that "green band discussion", it just doesn't bother me enough and I see loads of great Fujifilm X-... pictures.