08-05-2015, 08:59 AM
"Decently" is correct, and for me is satisfactory. But if you compare the lens lineup to Fuji's, well, ... I definitely see Fuji (the corporate and their customers) performing some kind of aggressive marketing now, pointing out that their APS-C commitment is different. After the fact, I'm fine with the Sony gear I have. Objectively, having used them for a couple of years, I'm really ok. But should I start an evaluation today, well, there are high chances that I'd go for a subjective evaluation in favour of Fuji.
This lens-wise. Sony's camera bodies such as the A6000 are clearly superior for what concerns AF and tracking.
Anyway, with the newest FF commitment from Sony I expect that some long lenses, today only available only in A-mount, will see a native E-mount version... right? :-)
This lens-wise. Sony's camera bodies such as the A6000 are clearly superior for what concerns AF and tracking.
Anyway, with the newest FF commitment from Sony I expect that some long lenses, today only available only in A-mount, will see a native E-mount version... right? :-)
stoppingdown.net
Sony a6300, Sony a6000, Sony NEX-6, Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS, Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS, Sigma 150-600mm Æ’/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary, Samyang 12mm Æ’/2, Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN | A, Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm Æ’/2.8, Samyang 8mm Æ’/3.5 fish-eye II | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm Æ’/2
Plus some legacy Nikkor lenses.
Sony a6300, Sony a6000, Sony NEX-6, Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS, Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS, Sigma 150-600mm Æ’/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary, Samyang 12mm Æ’/2, Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN | A, Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm Æ’/2.8, Samyang 8mm Æ’/3.5 fish-eye II | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm Æ’/2
Plus some legacy Nikkor lenses.