Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sample gallery Fujinon XF 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR
#31
er, yes. e-mount... I think I would prefer a fuji test personally for the 12mm.

#32
Quote:er, yes. e-mount... I think I would prefer a fuji test personally for the 12mm.
Over E-mount for sure, as those are being done on the "broken" nex-7.
#33
I wonder if the new a6300 will have any edge issues...

#34
I'm still waiting for the 18-135mm review.

Anything new yet?
#35
It's just a matter of priorities.

Canon, Nikon and Sony are keeping this site up and running ...

#36
Has the review been canceled or is it still on your list?

But reading your conclusion gives me the feeling that I should skip this lens anyway...l
#37
Quote:And which lenses do you think are the gems ?
 

I think the gems are mostly primes:
  • 14 f2.8
  • 16 f1.4
  • 23 f1.4
  • 56 f1.2
  • 90 f2
And maybe these 2 zooms:
  • 10-24 f4
  • 50-140 f2.8
Although the 35 f1.4 didn't fare that well in the tests I find my copy to be better sharpness-wise than any other primes I have (meaning 14, 23 f1.4 and 23 f2, and 56).
--Florent

Flickr gallery
#38
Don't forget the 100-400.

#39
Hardly a "gem" - just the only lens beyond 140 mm around for Fuji  Big Grin in terms of speed and sharpness I can imagine some improvements. But for sure, it's not worse than any current 150-600 on FF. Not much worse.

#40
Quote:Hardly a "gem" - just the only lens beyond 140 mm around for Fuji  Big Grin in terms of speed and sharpness I can imagine some improvements. But for sure, it's not worse than any current 150-600 on FF. Not much worse.
Uh, I thought there's a couple of 50(ish) to 200(ish) zooms in that stable and... I think Klaus had only the warm words to speak about the 100-400.  Huh
  


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)