Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
EF 400mm f4 DO IS USM II review, looks very good
#4
Given the recent release of Nikon's 300mm f/4 "PF" I don't think a generally similar 400mm is that much of a stretch to reach at some time in the future.

<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.
  


Messages In This Thread
EF 400mm f4 DO IS USM II review, looks very good - by Scythels - 01-13-2015, 12:23 AM
EF 400mm f4 DO IS USM II review, looks very good - by Guest - 01-13-2015, 02:35 PM
EF 400mm f4 DO IS USM II review, looks very good - by popo - 01-13-2015, 07:05 PM
EF 400mm f4 DO IS USM II review, looks very good - by davidmanze - 01-14-2015, 09:48 AM
EF 400mm f4 DO IS USM II review, looks very good - by Guest - 01-14-2015, 01:51 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)