Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Not that impressed
#10
Quote:I guess it's the small an lightweight Olympus M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/4-5.6 ED R MSC and not the new f/2.8 !-)

No need for the Olympus M.Zuiko 9-18mm f/4-5.6 ED?
 

Actually for light weight travel I still have the Panasonic 40-150 which produces quite amazing results actually.

And I still have the Panasonic 7-14/4.

 

Admittedly I ordered the 40-150/2.8 primarily for testing but you never know ;-)

Quote:I hope that before leaving it go you found the time for a review, including numbers :-) I've been using it since a long time and - while I perfectly understand your point of view - for me is ok. Too expensive for quality, but it has been an improvement relative to what I was using before, both in terms of size/weight and IQ.

 

Still I'm curious to see the MTF numbers.
 

I will, of course, continue to test Sony equipment. During the next 3 months there'll be at least 6 tests on my list.
  


Messages In This Thread
Not that impressed - by Klaus - 09-21-2014, 06:38 AM
Not that impressed - by goran h - 09-21-2014, 08:10 AM
Not that impressed - by Klaus - 09-21-2014, 08:32 AM
Not that impressed - by youpii - 09-21-2014, 09:51 AM
Not that impressed - by goran h - 09-21-2014, 11:26 AM
Not that impressed - by Kodachrome 25 - 09-21-2014, 11:48 AM
Not that impressed - by Klaus - 09-21-2014, 12:45 PM
Not that impressed - by Kodachrome 25 - 09-21-2014, 01:34 PM
Not that impressed - by stoppingdown - 09-21-2014, 04:03 PM
Not that impressed - by Guest - 10-22-2014, 09:44 AM
Not that impressed - by dave9t5 - 10-22-2014, 02:34 PM
Not that impressed - by Klaus - 09-21-2014, 10:19 PM
Not that impressed - by frank - 09-22-2014, 02:48 AM
Not that impressed - by joachim - 09-22-2014, 04:41 AM
Not that impressed - by Klaus - 09-22-2014, 09:59 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)