[Guest]

Well, these DSLR extreme zoom lenses aren't that hot and we are talking about a Leica/Zeiss lenses in those camera (even though they may only have "certified" a external design). However, I was surprised that even in the image center, the results are nowhere as sharp as from a MFT camera for instance - which isn't really related all that much to the lenses.

Still I think the images from a DSLR would be overall better.

 

OK, another try. You are taking A6000 with you anyway, don't you? And it looks like you want to add the super-zoom for the tele end, am I right? Then, if you can afford AF adapter, there's a very small telezoom Minolta AF 100-200 f/4.5; the reviews tell it's not worse than the famous 70-210 f/4; only the MFD is unfortunate 1.9m. I happened to hold a (scratched) copy of it on the second-hand market. It's small, lightweight and very cute. The only reason I still didn't buy one is that I already have three different 70-210 lenses. If I ever do a full switch from A-mount to E-mount, I get one.

Again, the adapter + 100-200 will weight less than the RX10.