05-15-2014, 12:41 PM
Great, thanks for the review, Klaus.
Do you feel the Fuji's QC has improved recently, or is it still bad? Obviously this is purely subjective, but I just want to gauge your gut feeling in this matter.
Just a couple of small remarks.
In the introduction you write "Currently this is the fastest Fuji lens - when looking over the fence Panasonic can claim to have the fasted mirrorless lens though (the Leica 42.5mm f/0.95)."
I suppose you meant to write "fastest" instead of "fasted".
Also, did you mean to talk about the Pana/Leica 42.5 which is also a f/1.2 lens or did you mean the Voigtlander which is indeed a 42.5 f/0.95 lens?
Do you actually have plans on testing both lenses on MFT? (Pana/Lecia and Voigtlander)
Do you feel the Fuji's QC has improved recently, or is it still bad? Obviously this is purely subjective, but I just want to gauge your gut feeling in this matter.
Just a couple of small remarks.
In the introduction you write "Currently this is the fastest Fuji lens - when looking over the fence Panasonic can claim to have the fasted mirrorless lens though (the Leica 42.5mm f/0.95)."
I suppose you meant to write "fastest" instead of "fasted".
Also, did you mean to talk about the Pana/Leica 42.5 which is also a f/1.2 lens or did you mean the Voigtlander which is indeed a 42.5 f/0.95 lens?
Do you actually have plans on testing both lenses on MFT? (Pana/Lecia and Voigtlander)