Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What's the point of taking pics if they will end up on damaged media (looking for reliable storage media)
#36
Quote:WIth Amazon Glacier costs are in the magnitude of $0.01 per gigabyte per month. You don't have a real-time access to data and thus the backup process must be managed with some more care, but being a long-term backup this is hardly a problem.
To me that's not cost effective and needs to go down another order of magnitude to be interesting for me. Let's say my total data set is 3TB. That'll be $30/month or $360 a year. I can easily buy 3 consumer grade 3TB hard disks for that much with change left over (keeping two local at all times, cycling the 3rd one offsite), and that will last multiple years. Personally I don't use 3 copies, only two, so the cost is even lower.
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.
  


Messages In This Thread
What's the point of taking pics if they will end up on damaged media (looking for reliable storage media) - by popo - 06-13-2014, 11:25 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)