Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What's the point of taking pics if they will end up on damaged media (looking for reliable storage media)
#40
For the moment, my worse case scenario is if my house gets toasted, I will have near 100% data loss as I don't use off-site at the moment. While disks don't last forever, I'm suggesting you could keep up to 3 copies at very low cost. Apart from the live copy, I don't run the backups 24/7 so they're not at risk from transient conditions.

 

While I'm not a data centre user in quantity of disks, I'd say there is a better than 95% chance of a disk lasting 3 years at 24/7 running, without noticeable error. With two copies, that's well over 99%, and considering I don't run them 24/7, the operating life may well be longer. If I were paranoid, a 3rd copy off site would pretty much cover reasonable scenarios outside the collapse of civilisation.

<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.
  


Messages In This Thread
What's the point of taking pics if they will end up on damaged media (looking for reliable storage media) - by popo - 06-14-2014, 11:34 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)