09-22-2017, 10:35 AM
Quote:Even if the optic keeps up: My guess is, the Sony is lighter (and pretty good, according to lensrentals) and less fat. The 16/1.4 is already a big lens, so that 8-16 appears to be similar sized as the current 24-70/2.8 from Tamron and Sigma.The Sony is also pretty good according to Photozone's Klaus
Anyway, it will find it's customers, I'm just not amongst them.
I doubt the Sony will be smaller, though? They may just be similar in size (which makes kinda sense, since they are pretty equivalent).
The Fuji 16mm is 73.4 x 73mm and 375 grams, the Sony 12-24mm f4 is 117.4 x 87mm and 565 grams. The size of that prototype 8-16mm in that image looks to be pretty close to the Sony size?