[Guest]

I think no matter how good (and I'm not sure mirrorless is good enough yet - i mean on reliabability front for heavy usage) there is still the issue of those who have lots of lenses. I am thinking journalists and nature photography. I think the image quailty is probably good enough (it is certainly better than old full frame such as 5d) so while a modern full frame will have better image quality and still do a much better job with tracking (spots photographers) as well as handle dust better I think olympus/fuji will have an attempt to make some slow movement. The biggest problem I see is that they are not that durable. fuji zoom lenses seem to have a high failure rate and both fuji and olympus can't deal with too much shock/dust last but least they also have very short battery life.

-

Certainly for a home user they are almost reliable enough but I wonder in terms of profits how things split between the home user and professional markets.

-

Anyways I will not buy another canon or niknon until they learn to shave off 600 or so grams while still retaining accurate focus and other electronic features.

-

I currently use olympus but am very tempted by this new fuji (my left eye is not so great so the xe-2 is not so wonderful but with middle viewfinder I can pick the eye) still I am still very concern by the higher failure rate in lenses and decenter issues i read about. I want my equipment to just work. I don't want to have to test it and play the return game.