12-18-2013, 09:58 AM
Quote:I look at the MTF chart, that shows a dive at the extremes. Is that not consistent with the images? So my interpretation of this is that it is not a QC problem but the actual design was never going to give you decent borders in the first place.
My comprehension of MTF chart is not strong, but I was thinking the same. Which would be a pity, of course. But - I've seen some full-res photos that have better resolution in the corners than the tests published by Kurt. That's why I'm still dubious. I mean: one thing is reckoning that corners are much worse than the center as the charts suggest; another is understanding in visual terms how this loss of quality looks.
stoppingdown.net
Sony a6300, Sony a6000, Sony NEX-6, Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS, Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS, Sigma 150-600mm Æ’/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary, Samyang 12mm Æ’/2, Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN | A, Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm Æ’/2.8, Samyang 8mm Æ’/3.5 fish-eye II | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm Æ’/2
Plus some legacy Nikkor lenses.
Sony a6300, Sony a6000, Sony NEX-6, Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS, Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS, Sigma 150-600mm Æ’/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary, Samyang 12mm Æ’/2, Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN | A, Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm Æ’/2.8, Samyang 8mm Æ’/3.5 fish-eye II | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm Æ’/2
Plus some legacy Nikkor lenses.