Posts: 6,716
Threads: 236
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
25
The Sony is not that good (weaker corners, not that cheap, bad amounts of vignetting). So it would be odd to cite it in context of the post I reacted to?
I have not seen many Sony E mount cameras used, and none with a Sony 10-18mm, by the way.
Posts: 7,958
Threads: 1,832
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
45
The Sony lens is
a) quite good actually
b) spec wise more similar than your examples
c) the answer to all questions in the universe isn't always Canon
Posts: 6,716
Threads: 236
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
25
The answer to more affordable wide angle in this case clearly is Canon (the 16-35mm f4 L IS USM is almost the same price, the 10-18mm is almost a quarter the price, the 11-22mm is less than half the price).
I responded to "The Fuji 10-24 f4 is pretty damn good compared to what's available elsewhere (DSLR or mirrorless)."
I disagree, it is pretty darn expensive compared to what is available elsewhere, and in performance comparable to what is available elsewhere. That you react allergic to Canon is not my fault.
Posts: 2,667
Threads: 582
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
15
We'll regardless of quality and value for money, it's clear nobody knows how to sell photography gear better than Canon. Their marketing department seems outstanding.
