08-11-2013, 01:52 PM
Actually I like the image quality of the Sony 16-50. Except for the borders at the wide end of course.
It has a pretty pronounced "3d effect" by the way.
Build quality is a different story. Anybody still thinks it has metal mount? Unfortunately it has plastic mount stupidly covered with thin layer of nickel or alike. Mine already started to peel off.
Still, if you don't change lenses too often, it's not a problem. And this lens is smaller than Sigma 30/2.8.
It has a pretty pronounced "3d effect" by the way.
Build quality is a different story. Anybody still thinks it has metal mount? Unfortunately it has plastic mount stupidly covered with thin layer of nickel or alike. Mine already started to peel off.
Still, if you don't change lenses too often, it's not a problem. And this lens is smaller than Sigma 30/2.8.