06-23-2013, 10:19 AM
Reading the 12-50 review I was wondering if you could test a m43 lens (the 12-35 would get my vote, the 12-50 would be good too) to see how the edge/corner sharpness changes if you don't have the distortion correction but use the uncorrected data from the raw file?
I wonder if the difference is enough that for some subjects (e.g. with branches/leaves in the corners) it might be better to go without the corrections? I note Roger Cicala at Lens Rentals gives uncorrected m43 results that do seem relatively better (to me ) vs. their competitors than your results.
I wonder if the difference is enough that for some subjects (e.g. with branches/leaves in the corners) it might be better to go without the corrections? I note Roger Cicala at Lens Rentals gives uncorrected m43 results that do seem relatively better (to me ) vs. their competitors than your results.