Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sony NEX future
#31
Quote:Honestly, FF mirrorless is a phantom pain. The images delivered from a Fuji are superb already and why bother with extra weight (from heavier lenses) ?
 

Contax G & Leica M lenses cover FF and are small 
#32
Ask Markus about the vignetting ...


And 90mm are about the finish line in these system. A 300mm lens will be barely any smaller than on a DSLR.
#33
Quote:Ask Markus about the vignetting ...
Yep. Peak value measured is above 5 EV, IIRC. And no, that wasn't a cheap 3rd-party lens...

Vignetting numbers are generally much higher on the M9 than what we're used to with a DSLR (any sensor size).
Quote:And 90mm are about the finish line in these system. A 300mm lens will be barely any smaller than on a DSLR.
The Leica 135/2.8 is already quite large. On a small camera (that's what we're all hoping for when dreaming of a full-frame mirrorless, right?) too large and too heavy. The combo is already quite arkward to handle.

-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com

#34
Quote:The Leica 135/2.8 is already quite large. On a small camera (that's what we're all hoping for when dreaming of a full-frame mirrorless, right?) too large and too heavy. The combo is already quite arkward to handle.


-- Markus
 

When I dream of full-frame mirrorless, I'm thinking about something that looks like a modern version of an Olympus OM-4TI or a Nikon FM3a, but with a slightly shorter flange distance (~36-42mm). Well, maybe that's just me  :lol:

 

But I agree that small sensors (and thus smaller and lighter lenses) make more sense for rangefinder-esque mirrorless cameras. 
  


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)