[Guest]

A review should give an indication about the performance of a non-faulty product. Because that's what you expect when you buy such a lens.


Testing a decentered lens (and publishing the results) would be like testing the performance of a car with flat tires.


-- Markus

 

I second that! The test should show the potential of the lens: that's what a good copy can deliver. And bad copies should be mentioned in the text, as a caveat.

 

(And I believe this is how photozone usually does it.)