Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Your thoughts on the DX vs the FX thing?
#10
One thing that kinda annoys me is many people seem to married to the idea that every pixel needs to be sharp all the time. They lose sight of the bigger picture. Having said that, it is fair to a point, as you may need every pixel to be sharp if you don't have enough of them in the first place.

 

Of course I do agree that MP quantity is not the only consideration, in the same way that bigger sensors aren't a magic win. There are many factors that contribute to the best solution for a given need.

<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.
  


Messages In This Thread
Your thoughts on the DX vs the FX thing? - by davidmanze - 02-25-2013, 01:38 PM
Your thoughts on the DX vs the FX thing? - by Guest - 02-25-2013, 02:00 PM
Your thoughts on the DX vs the FX thing? - by Studor13 - 02-25-2013, 02:47 PM
Your thoughts on the DX vs the FX thing? - by popo - 02-25-2013, 08:28 PM
Your thoughts on the DX vs the FX thing? - by hereiam2005 - 02-27-2013, 12:01 PM
Your thoughts on the DX vs the FX thing? - by Guest - 02-28-2013, 10:55 AM
Your thoughts on the DX vs the FX thing? - by Guest - 03-01-2013, 12:58 PM
Your thoughts on the DX vs the FX thing? - by Guest - 03-01-2013, 01:26 PM
Your thoughts on the DX vs the FX thing? - by Guest - 03-01-2013, 01:30 PM
Your thoughts on the DX vs the FX thing? - by hereiam2005 - 03-02-2013, 03:21 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)