Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next PZ lens test report: Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm f/4 VR
#5
Well, yes and no. The Tamron is not a constant f/4 lens, has lesser build quality, slightly worse bokeh, can not take a tripod mount or TCs and has less effective stabilization. And last but not least, the Nikon's AF is faster.



Of course it depends on individual priorities if that's worth the premium price.



-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com

  


Messages In This Thread
Next PZ lens test report: Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm f/4 VR - by Studor13 - 02-02-2013, 06:47 AM
Next PZ lens test report: Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm f/4 VR - by mst - 02-02-2013, 02:50 PM
Next PZ lens test report: Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm f/4 VR - by PuxaVida - 02-12-2013, 03:25 PM
Next PZ lens test report: Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm f/4 VR - by PuxaVida - 02-12-2013, 03:31 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)