Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Fujifilm announcements ...
#31
Sigh.... 

#32
Quote:Sigh.... 
 

yeah, it would have been so much easier if you cited the Sony 10-18mm f/4 rather than the  usual Canon stuff ...
#33
The Sony is not that good (weaker corners, not that cheap, bad amounts of vignetting). So it would be odd to cite it in context of the post I reacted to?

 

I have not seen many Sony E mount cameras used, and none with a Sony 10-18mm, by the way.

#34
The Sony lens is

a) quite good actually 

b) spec wise more similar than your examples

c) the answer to all questions in the universe isn't always Canon

#35
The answer to more affordable wide angle in this case clearly is Canon (the 16-35mm f4 L IS USM is almost the same price, the 10-18mm is almost a quarter the price, the 11-22mm is less than half the price).

 

I responded to "The Fuji 10-24 f4 is pretty damn good compared to what's available elsewhere (DSLR or mirrorless)."

 

I disagree, it is pretty darn expensive compared to what is available elsewhere, and in performance comparable to what is available elsewhere. That you react allergic to Canon is not my fault.

#36
We'll regardless of quality and value for money, it's clear nobody knows how to sell photography gear better than Canon. Their marketing department seems outstanding.
  


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
5 Guest(s)