09-30-2012, 02:43 PM
[quote name='wim' timestamp='1349000927' post='20433']
Of course, it is good for stills too.
However, the initial pictures of this lens were all on EF-mount video dslrs and Canon's new range of video cameras. The blurbs even said something along the lines of the IS being implemented for video.
Kind regards, Wim
[/quote]
If so, why aren't these lenses equipped with STM which was touted as a video feature? It seems as if the decision making at Canon is pretty chaotic (no video AF on 5D III while it's there on the 650D; the sheer existence of lenses like this and the 24 with no comparable longer lenses; the abovementioned lack of "video-friendly" STM motor...)
Of course, it is good for stills too.
However, the initial pictures of this lens were all on EF-mount video dslrs and Canon's new range of video cameras. The blurbs even said something along the lines of the IS being implemented for video.
Kind regards, Wim
[/quote]
If so, why aren't these lenses equipped with STM which was touted as a video feature? It seems as if the decision making at Canon is pretty chaotic (no video AF on 5D III while it's there on the 650D; the sheer existence of lenses like this and the 24 with no comparable longer lenses; the abovementioned lack of "video-friendly" STM motor...)