09-22-2012, 08:37 PM
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1348322393' post='20327']
Not as stellar as the price suggests:
[url="http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/773-canon2470f28mk2ff"]http://www.photozone...non2470f28mk2ff[/url]
[/quote]
Hmm, the Canon pricing policy seems slightly arrogant in this respect. Of course, they are Canon - "they can". But for the money, the lens should be really better at f2.8.
Like it was said in the summary: Now the Tamron 24-70 really IS a much more reasonable choice for most Canon shooters. Yes, the build quality may me better with Canon but remember you can buy 2 Tamron lenses for the price of 1 Canon - what will be more durable then...? ;-)
Not as stellar as the price suggests:
[url="http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/773-canon2470f28mk2ff"]http://www.photozone...non2470f28mk2ff[/url]
[/quote]
Hmm, the Canon pricing policy seems slightly arrogant in this respect. Of course, they are Canon - "they can". But for the money, the lens should be really better at f2.8.
Like it was said in the summary: Now the Tamron 24-70 really IS a much more reasonable choice for most Canon shooters. Yes, the build quality may me better with Canon but remember you can buy 2 Tamron lenses for the price of 1 Canon - what will be more durable then...? ;-)