09-17-2012, 03:54 PM
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1347896294' post='20187']
The point is that you HAVE no point. It is a fallacy.
fallacy
noun ( pl. -cies)
a mistaken belief, esp. one based on unsound argument : the notion that the camera never lies is a fallacy.
• Logic a failure in reasoning that renders an argument invalid.
• faulty reasoning; misleading or unsound argument : the potential for fallacy which lies behind the notion of self-esteem.
If you want to go FF, you want to use FF. For that, you will need a FF capable lens.
With me so far?
Ok.
So, you need to buy a FF capable lens. Suppose you had a D7000 with a Nikkor 17-55mm f2.8 DX APS-C standard zoom. What could be a reason to want to go FF? DOF flexibility is a possibility.
Anyway. For you to have standard zoom FF capability you will need to actually buy a FF standard zoom. That is just how things are.
So. Now you have a D600, with for instance a 24-70mm f2.8 lens (FF standard zoom).
Does it make sense to use the 17-55mm and D600 as APS-C camera instead? No. The 17-55mm f2.8 on the D600 has lost its usefulness.
It is that simple. There is no extra value in that you have that 17-55 from before. None. One went to FF not to use it as a 10mp APS-C downgrade to the 16mp D7000.
The only advantage of APS-C usage over FF usage will be more tele reach when used with tele lenses (and one doesn't want to crop on the computer). But the tele lenses are FF anyway.
[/quote]
And again you fail to see what I wrote.
Maybe you understand it in simpler words:
UPGRADERS from APS-C are likely to have to change lenses anyway, in which case they might as well look at the D600. Simple as that.
The point is that you HAVE no point. It is a fallacy.
fallacy
noun ( pl. -cies)
a mistaken belief, esp. one based on unsound argument : the notion that the camera never lies is a fallacy.
• Logic a failure in reasoning that renders an argument invalid.
• faulty reasoning; misleading or unsound argument : the potential for fallacy which lies behind the notion of self-esteem.
If you want to go FF, you want to use FF. For that, you will need a FF capable lens.
With me so far?
Ok.
So, you need to buy a FF capable lens. Suppose you had a D7000 with a Nikkor 17-55mm f2.8 DX APS-C standard zoom. What could be a reason to want to go FF? DOF flexibility is a possibility.
Anyway. For you to have standard zoom FF capability you will need to actually buy a FF standard zoom. That is just how things are.
So. Now you have a D600, with for instance a 24-70mm f2.8 lens (FF standard zoom).
Does it make sense to use the 17-55mm and D600 as APS-C camera instead? No. The 17-55mm f2.8 on the D600 has lost its usefulness.
It is that simple. There is no extra value in that you have that 17-55 from before. None. One went to FF not to use it as a 10mp APS-C downgrade to the 16mp D7000.
The only advantage of APS-C usage over FF usage will be more tele reach when used with tele lenses (and one doesn't want to crop on the computer). But the tele lenses are FF anyway.
[/quote]
And again you fail to see what I wrote.
Maybe you understand it in simpler words:
UPGRADERS from APS-C are likely to have to change lenses anyway, in which case they might as well look at the D600. Simple as that.