07-24-2012, 01:05 PM
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1342976289' post='19537']
One is a Nikon, the other a Sony. You can not just assume they will show the same noise just because their sensors both come from Sony. Best is to compare it with a NEX.
And the image will only be underexposed if for some reason you feel you have to keep the exposure times exactly the same. Which of course you do not have to want to.
Anyway. we do not shoot to get noise equal, so that is a bit odd a debate <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> .
I do not exactly know what Klaus meant, but probably he meant that the SLT's are that half a stop behind (and was not talking about your underexposure idea). And you are getting it right, now, I think.
[/quote]
Hi BC, a question if you get to read this:
SLTs are 2/3rd stop behind (i figured this out on DXOmark).
Now does that mean ISO 100 and 200 will be 2/3rd stop noisier than the the DSLRs? Or does this apply to ONLY HIGH ISOs?
regards,
anurag
One is a Nikon, the other a Sony. You can not just assume they will show the same noise just because their sensors both come from Sony. Best is to compare it with a NEX.
And the image will only be underexposed if for some reason you feel you have to keep the exposure times exactly the same. Which of course you do not have to want to.
Anyway. we do not shoot to get noise equal, so that is a bit odd a debate <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> .I do not exactly know what Klaus meant, but probably he meant that the SLT's are that half a stop behind (and was not talking about your underexposure idea). And you are getting it right, now, I think.
[/quote]
Hi BC, a question if you get to read this:
SLTs are 2/3rd stop behind (i figured this out on DXOmark).
Now does that mean ISO 100 and 200 will be 2/3rd stop noisier than the the DSLRs? Or does this apply to ONLY HIGH ISOs?
regards,
anurag