Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
SLT vs. SLR
#12
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1342902913' post='19526']

yes, this is roughly correct.

However, there is no mirror slap which compensates a bit of the loss due to the lack of mirror-induced vibrations.

[/quote]



Klaus, The 2/3rd stop loss is compensated by no mirror blur and steady-shot...but only on static subjects...what if you need higher shutter speeds? Shooting action at 1/250 or 1/125 minimum will put you at a disadvantage if you can't go up on ISO 3200 because of noise.
  


Messages In This Thread
SLT vs. SLR - by nandadevieast - 07-21-2012, 07:47 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by Klaus - 07-21-2012, 08:35 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by Brightcolours - 07-21-2012, 08:54 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by nandadevieast - 07-22-2012, 05:59 AM
SLT vs. SLR - by Brightcolours - 07-22-2012, 08:32 AM
SLT vs. SLR - by nandadevieast - 07-22-2012, 12:03 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by Brightcolours - 07-22-2012, 01:07 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by nandadevieast - 07-22-2012, 04:25 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by Brightcolours - 07-22-2012, 04:58 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by nandadevieast - 07-22-2012, 06:21 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by nandadevieast - 07-24-2012, 01:05 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by nandadevieast - 07-24-2012, 01:10 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by Brightcolours - 07-24-2012, 05:01 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by nandadevieast - 07-25-2012, 08:26 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)