06-09-2012, 12:20 PM
The same physical limitations as for mirrored phase AF were obvious, however I think in time they may have potential to match the coverage where it becomes more viable as a mirror replacement.
I didn't pay attention at the time, but I wonder how the Fuji and Nikon systems compare in relative coverage.
I didn't pay attention at the time, but I wonder how the Fuji and Nikon systems compare in relative coverage.
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.