Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
EOS 6D II and 200D (Rebel SL2) announced
#45
Quote:It may be nonsense to you, but it simply isn't for me. I have worked with the "limited" tone range of B&W photography for 30+ years, and I still expose stuff the same way in digital, or rather, similarly, taking highlight blow-outs into account. It works for me.


It is not nonsense, I guess we just have different approaches, and that is all there is to it.


Kind regards, Wim
First, you're not the only one who worked with the zone system. I did so, too, and it was a huge boost to learn it for me. Pictures improved a lot.

To zone system belong various techniques to reduce or increase the tonal range of film. Such as overexpose and develop shorter for situations with general low contrast like foggy landscapes. Or underexpose and develop longer, preferrably with a softer developer for high contrast scenes. If I recall correctly? Or was it the other way round? I never went very deep into this + 1 or -2 stuff although I read Henk Roelfesema's books as well as Ansel's. I had two film magazines on my Mamiya, but some memories I also wanted to catch in colors. Today I would be very happy if I had had a bigger DR.


Now, I see statements like "no one needs more than x f-stops" like a very unreasonably set yet unneccessary limit. Sure, different people, different approaches, but as long as there are bigger contrasts around in nature, I have to ask "why not take advantage of sensor improvements" and instead stick to film era limits? Any good reason for that? I'm just asking because I can't think of a single one.


All dodging and burning or playing around with tonal curves can only improve the recorded data. Be it on film or sensor: lost or unrecorded data simply can't benefit of post production refinements because it's not available in the first place. Recovering highlights only works within the limits of captured highlights. Lost ones remains lost!


And if it still remains unclear, what I say, here's one of thousands examples what higher DR can do: <a class="bbc_url" href="https://www.dpreview.com/articles/9895055303/this-eclipse-photo-shows-crazy-dynamic-range-of-today-s-image-sensors">https://www.dpreview.com/articles/9895055303/this-eclipse-photo-shows-crazy-dynamic-range-of-today-s-image-sensors</a>
  


Messages In This Thread
EOS 6D II and 200D (Rebel SL2) announced - by Reinier - 07-04-2017, 05:57 PM
EOS 6D II and 200D (Rebel SL2) announced - by Guest - 08-13-2017, 10:49 AM
EOS 6D II and 200D (Rebel SL2) announced - by Reinier - 08-23-2017, 09:45 PM
EOS 6D II and 200D (Rebel SL2) announced - by miro - 08-24-2017, 10:02 AM
EOS 6D II and 200D (Rebel SL2) announced - by miro - 08-24-2017, 08:38 PM
EOS 6D II and 200D (Rebel SL2) announced - by miro - 08-25-2017, 07:59 AM
EOS 6D II and 200D (Rebel SL2) announced - by wim - 08-25-2017, 12:45 PM
EOS 6D II and 200D (Rebel SL2) announced - by wim - 08-25-2017, 06:54 PM
EOS 6D II and 200D (Rebel SL2) announced - by miro - 08-25-2017, 07:36 PM
EOS 6D II and 200D (Rebel SL2) announced - by JJ_SO - 08-25-2017, 08:29 PM
EOS 6D II and 200D (Rebel SL2) announced - by wim - 08-27-2017, 06:33 PM
EOS 6D II and 200D (Rebel SL2) announced - by wim - 08-27-2017, 06:41 PM
EOS 6D II and 200D (Rebel SL2) announced - by wim - 08-27-2017, 06:45 PM
EOS 6D II and 200D (Rebel SL2) announced - by miro - 08-28-2017, 10:34 AM
EOS 6D II and 200D (Rebel SL2) announced - by miro - 08-28-2017, 11:43 AM
EOS 6D II and 200D (Rebel SL2) announced - by wim - 08-28-2017, 08:52 PM
EOS 6D II and 200D (Rebel SL2) announced - by wim - 08-28-2017, 09:11 PM
EOS 6D II and 200D (Rebel SL2) announced - by miro - 08-29-2017, 08:21 AM
EOS 6D II and 200D (Rebel SL2) announced - by wim - 09-01-2017, 09:06 PM
EOS 6D II and 200D (Rebel SL2) announced - by wim - 09-01-2017, 09:10 PM
EOS 6D II and 200D (Rebel SL2) announced - by wim - 09-01-2017, 09:13 PM
EOS 6D II and 200D (Rebel SL2) announced - by wim - 09-01-2017, 11:31 PM
EOS 6D II and 200D (Rebel SL2) announced - by miro - 09-06-2017, 07:17 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)