05-02-2012, 05:58 PM
[quote name='arv' timestamp='1335971682' post='17929']
Well, theoretically you already had one <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> . Just curious - I suppose you have tried it in real world shots - was the defect obvious, or just noticeable on chart shots?
A.
[/quote]
Markus tested it (he wanted to try the camera). He liked the results in the field but spotted the problem on the chart at max. aperture.
At f/1.4 you can always argue - weak contrast, okay, that's life - but it was obviously a centering defect.
Well, theoretically you already had one <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> . Just curious - I suppose you have tried it in real world shots - was the defect obvious, or just noticeable on chart shots?
A.
[/quote]
Markus tested it (he wanted to try the camera). He liked the results in the field but spotted the problem on the chart at max. aperture.
At f/1.4 you can always argue - weak contrast, okay, that's life - but it was obviously a centering defect.