04-22-2012, 12:59 PM
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1335077992' post='17685']
The 5D mkII already was similar to the D700/D3 at higher ISO settings. The 5D mk III is comparable to the D800 and D4 at higher ISO settings. In fact, the provisional early results from comparisons with the D800 show the 5D mk III to have a bit nicer results from ISO 6400 and up.
The only big difference is the low read noise from the Sony sensors since the 16mp APS-C one.
[/quote]
Doesn't the 5D MKII have banding issues? (I think I read something along these lines in the forums)
My K10D was great at low ISO, but it had pretty bad banding issues when pushing shadows or at higher ISO which was really annoying and difficult to fix in PP. By opposition, my K20D had much less banding and despite having a lower DR (at base ISO), I found it more useful when pushing the shadows.
The 5D mkII already was similar to the D700/D3 at higher ISO settings. The 5D mk III is comparable to the D800 and D4 at higher ISO settings. In fact, the provisional early results from comparisons with the D800 show the 5D mk III to have a bit nicer results from ISO 6400 and up.
The only big difference is the low read noise from the Sony sensors since the 16mp APS-C one.
[/quote]
Doesn't the 5D MKII have banding issues? (I think I read something along these lines in the forums)
My K10D was great at low ISO, but it had pretty bad banding issues when pushing shadows or at higher ISO which was really annoying and difficult to fix in PP. By opposition, my K20D had much less banding and despite having a lower DR (at base ISO), I found it more useful when pushing the shadows.