Exactly 
. I will keep shooting with my Canon lenses. I really like what they provide, I know what to expect, as to how they work, and what the end result is, and which I have become accustomed to. I don't look at cameras and lenses for their price either, I look at what I want to achieve, the way I like it, and whether that is worth it to me. It is not a bookkeeping exercise for me, and fortunately I am in a position that I do not have to look at it that way either .
The funny part is that it is not about these lenses being "genuine" lenses, it is the combination of camera(s) and lenses and the resulting images, IOW, a personal preference. F.e., I do not like how Zeiss and Voightlander lenses render either (I have tried quite a few), and quite a few were and are quite a bit more expensive than the equivalent Canon glass, apart from the fact that I have some specialist lenses for which no real equivalent can be found yet either, except, partly, with Nikon, although I may have a go at some specific other 3rd party lenses, at some time in the future.
Anyway, my FF lens collection is about as complete as it will ever get, barring maybe a specific single lens, and anything else will just be a nice to have over the top, and will likely only be rarely used anyway.
My MFT lens line-up will likely still change quite a bit over the next few years, however, while I am still going through phases I already went through with Canon, APS-C and FF, although I have a good idea where it will be going 
.
Kind regards, Wim
. I will keep shooting with my Canon lenses. I really like what they provide, I know what to expect, as to how they work, and what the end result is, and which I have become accustomed to. I don't look at cameras and lenses for their price either, I look at what I want to achieve, the way I like it, and whether that is worth it to me. It is not a bookkeeping exercise for me, and fortunately I am in a position that I do not have to look at it that way either .The funny part is that it is not about these lenses being "genuine" lenses, it is the combination of camera(s) and lenses and the resulting images, IOW, a personal preference. F.e., I do not like how Zeiss and Voightlander lenses render either (I have tried quite a few), and quite a few were and are quite a bit more expensive than the equivalent Canon glass, apart from the fact that I have some specialist lenses for which no real equivalent can be found yet either, except, partly, with Nikon, although I may have a go at some specific other 3rd party lenses, at some time in the future.
Anyway, my FF lens collection is about as complete as it will ever get, barring maybe a specific single lens, and anything else will just be a nice to have over the top, and will likely only be rarely used anyway.
My MFT lens line-up will likely still change quite a bit over the next few years, however, while I am still going through phases I already went through with Canon, APS-C and FF
, although I have a good idea where it will be going .Kind regards, Wim
Gear: Canon EOS R with 3 primes and 2 zooms, 4 EF-R adapters, Canon EOS 5 (analog), 9 Canon EF primes, a lone Canon EF zoom, 2 extenders, 2 converters, tubes; Olympus OM-D 1 Mk II & Pen F with 12 primes, 6 zooms, and 3 Metabones EF-MFT adapters ....