[Guest]

Price: $699



http://www.dpreview.com/previews/sonyslta57/5



The IQ looks better than 60D, despite the SLT sensor.



Canon remains at the bottom in last place in APSC world.

[popo]

Are we looking at the same thing? They look, for practical purposes, the same to me. I tried low and high ISO in RAW at that link. Then again I was never an obsessive pixel peeper.



Putting that aside, Canon do rank relatively low on DxO's sensor ranking, but don't forget the 18MP sensor currently used across most of the range is... about 2.5 years old now and is likely to be replaced shortly. Sony and others have refreshed since that time so it isn't surprising if they may gain an advantage in some areas. Most of the gain seems to be with greater measured dynamic range at low ISO.

[Klaus]

[quote name='Sathe Wild' timestamp='1331638753' post='16653']

Price: $699



[url="http://www.dpreview.com/previews/sonyslta57/5"]http://www.dpreview....ws/sonyslta57/5[/url]



The IQ looks better than 60D, despite the SLT sensor.



Canon remains at the bottom in last place in APSC world.

[/quote]



The NEX 5n sensor is a fine one, isn't it ?





The GX-1 delivers sharper results though. Problably a much weaker AA filter and the SLT mirror is softening the results as well.