03-11-2012, 09:26 PM
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1331500344' post='16576']
If the "sensor issue" is exaggerated... this 30mm macro lens really sucks! Look that those figures. Look that the low contrast in the borders and edges. And look at the performance wide open of that new 50mm. [/quote]
This was already known about this lens from previous reviews (weaker corners, and that was on Nex-3. And I posted the link to that review 2 months ago. But despite that, Nex-7 with 30mm macro still did a better job than M9 with 50mm f/1.4 Summilux-M.
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/M9/M9A.HTM
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1331500344' post='16576']
If the ghosting of the A55 was a non-issue, I wonder why so many examples of it have appeared on internet. I wonder also why people actually tested of the A77 was also affected then. [/quote]
Funny that DPR (after taking thousands of images) didn't even notice the "ghosting" in the first review. They had to "revise" the review a second time, but they still declared it an insignificant issue. IR conclusion was the same. But for some reason the Canon fanboys are more obsessed with "ghosting". You were obsessed with A55 two years ago, and you are still stuck on it, like a broken clock.
If the "sensor issue" is exaggerated... this 30mm macro lens really sucks! Look that those figures. Look that the low contrast in the borders and edges. And look at the performance wide open of that new 50mm. [/quote]
This was already known about this lens from previous reviews (weaker corners, and that was on Nex-3. And I posted the link to that review 2 months ago. But despite that, Nex-7 with 30mm macro still did a better job than M9 with 50mm f/1.4 Summilux-M.
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/M9/M9A.HTM
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1331500344' post='16576']
If the ghosting of the A55 was a non-issue, I wonder why so many examples of it have appeared on internet. I wonder also why people actually tested of the A77 was also affected then. [/quote]
Funny that DPR (after taking thousands of images) didn't even notice the "ghosting" in the first review. They had to "revise" the review a second time, but they still declared it an insignificant issue. IR conclusion was the same. But for some reason the Canon fanboys are more obsessed with "ghosting". You were obsessed with A55 two years ago, and you are still stuck on it, like a broken clock.