Posts: 442
Threads: 25
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
1
It's Sigma 70 2.8 Macro
Others are
Samyang 14 2.8
Zeiss 85 1.4
Zeiss 138 1.8
Minolta 200 2.8HS
But the weather is so cloudy that I don't even want to exit my house today.
How many 4* lens do you have?
[quote name='youpii' timestamp='1330170168' post='16150']
It's Sigma 70 2.8 Macro
Others are
Samyang 14 2.8
Zeiss 85 1.4
Zeiss 138 1.8
Minolta 200 2.8HS
But the weather is so cloudy that I don't even want to exit my house today.
How many 4* lens do you have?
[/quote]
Six
4* or 4.5*
All Nikkors, tested on DX format
Any more bids?
Posts: 1,252
Threads: 112
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
18
[quote name='AAC7man' timestamp='1330173627' post='16151']
Six
4* or 4.5*
All Nikkors, tested on DX format
Any more bids?
[/quote]
Only two... Pentax FA 35 and Pentax DA 100 macro.
[quote name='youpii' timestamp='1330170168' post='16150']How many 4* lens do you have?[/quote]
Zero, zilch, nada. Somehow I manage to shoot my stuff without spending tons of money for PZ approved glass.
[quote name='AAC7man' timestamp='1330173627' post='16151']
Six
4* or 4.5*
All Nikkors, tested on DX format
Any more bids?
[/quote]
To be clear (and fair) - all tested on D200
Because that's what I have
[quote name='Sammy' timestamp='1330183368' post='16156']
Zero, zilch, nada. Somehow I manage to shoot my stuff without spending tons of money for PZ approved glass.
[/quote]
Aw go on... we all need a fetish
Posts: 1,340
Threads: 55
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
0
Of lenses I currently have, 4 lenses tested on Canon (any body) got **** or higher in optical rating.
One wasn't rated due to decentering (Sigma 150mm macro non-OS) but the Nikon format review was excellent and I think it a fair chance it would have got a high score on Canon also had it not been for the sample.
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.
Posts: 621
Threads: 46
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
0
[quote name='Sammy' timestamp='1330183368' post='16156']
Zero, zilch, nada. Somehow I manage to shoot my stuff without spending tons of money for PZ approved glass.
[/quote]
Hi
I am sort of with Sammy here. While I like PZ I don't know the ratings of my lenses and in particular don't know them by hard. I typically don't even look at the stars - I look at the graphs and samples to decide whether something is useful to me. And believe it or not, even with lenses Klaus ( and everyone else) is critical about I managed to get nice pictures from.
Take picture, print pictures, use pictures, eat pictures, enjoy pictures ...
If you have nice lenses and cameras enjoy them too. But bragging about PZ ratings is crass in my view.
I am sorry if I offended anyone. You shouldn't the above is just my current opinion and no objective truth.
Best
J.
enjoy
' /> 
' /><img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='