|
Panasonic X 12-35 and 35-100
|
01-11-2012, 09:29 PM
So they'll be f/2.8 ...
http://photorumors.com/2012/01/11/panaso...-concepts/ Which is fine for me at least. 58mm diameter so they seem to be fairly small.
01-11-2012, 10:29 PM
It's still nothing official. Still the same platic mock ups but I think f/2 was unrealistic anyway.
I had made a dirty (loosely accurate <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='  ' />) comparison based on the mocks in the past, posted again. [ATTACHMENT NOT FOUND] Pink is 12-35 lens, then 14-42, then 14-45. the 35-100 f/2.8 is very interesting I think.
01-12-2012, 12:10 AM
Nice. If it's indeed f/2.8 and that small, the 12-35mm might be the very first zoom lens for my Panny <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
 ' />
01-12-2012, 07:00 AM
[quote name='Sylvain' timestamp='1326320956' post='14769']
It's still nothing official. Still the same platic mock ups but I think f/2 was unrealistic anyway. I had made a dirty (loosely accurate <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=' ' />) comparison based on the mocks in the past, posted again. [ATTACHMENT NOT FOUND] Pink is 12-35 lens, then 14-42, then 14-45. the 35-100 f/2.8 is very interesting I think. [/quote] These prototypes are different. Last year they didn't show an imprinted aperture nor the filter diameter.
01-12-2012, 12:29 PM
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1326351603' post='14783']
These prototypes are different. Last year they didn't show an imprinted aperture nor the filter diameter. [/quote] I'd think they're essentially the same with added switch & stickers. Nothing I'd call new. And a better matching than mine there : http://www.43rumors.com/real-images-of-t...t-x-zooms/ |
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 1 Guest(s) |
