01-10-2012, 01:58 PM
[quote name='Martin_MM' timestamp='1326201385' post='14670']
Not the latest but I had the (I think it was..) G1 in my hands.... Actually, the "single" AF for static shots was pretty good (totally acceptable), however, it seemed unusable for tracking even something as slow as a slowly walking person + had troubles catching in low light... To my surprise, I´ve heard the same experience with "the most pro" Sony NEX-7 - bad/unsable continuous AF and problems in low light (which otherwise the camera can easily shoot under with higher ISO).
But again (in all honesty), I have just heard that about NEX-7 (=no personal testing) and and I´m just afraid of the same limitations in this beautiful pro Fuji.
[/quote]
Honestly I doubt that the Fuji will be a camera for action photography. They simply lack the expertise regarding object tracking so far. Maybe I'm wrong.
I have no sufficent experience with the NEX 7 yet. I has AF problems in low light but no idea regarding action photography yet.
Not the latest but I had the (I think it was..) G1 in my hands.... Actually, the "single" AF for static shots was pretty good (totally acceptable), however, it seemed unusable for tracking even something as slow as a slowly walking person + had troubles catching in low light... To my surprise, I´ve heard the same experience with "the most pro" Sony NEX-7 - bad/unsable continuous AF and problems in low light (which otherwise the camera can easily shoot under with higher ISO).
But again (in all honesty), I have just heard that about NEX-7 (=no personal testing) and and I´m just afraid of the same limitations in this beautiful pro Fuji.
[/quote]
Honestly I doubt that the Fuji will be a camera for action photography. They simply lack the expertise regarding object tracking so far. Maybe I'm wrong.
I have no sufficent experience with the NEX 7 yet. I has AF problems in low light but no idea regarding action photography yet.