01-09-2012, 05:30 PM
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1326128350' post='14572']
The Panasonic 20/1.7 is probably more attractive than the 19/2.8 ... and a 30/2.8 .... it's not even a macro lens.
[/quote]
I was thinking the same about the Pana 20mm, except for one thing - it is rather dated in AF speed by current standards so for some that might be enough of a difference.
I was also wondering if either of these were macro as that would make a little more sense with their size and slowness.
The Panasonic 20/1.7 is probably more attractive than the 19/2.8 ... and a 30/2.8 .... it's not even a macro lens.
[/quote]
I was thinking the same about the Pana 20mm, except for one thing - it is rather dated in AF speed by current standards so for some that might be enough of a difference.
I was also wondering if either of these were macro as that would make a little more sense with their size and slowness.
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.