04-27-2012, 09:15 PM
First, I'm talking µFT, not Sony!
Why bashing this lenses without having them tested?
Does a "stylish" lens automatically creates better pictures?
Do I take pictures of my camera with the lens attached or pictures with the camera and lens?
The 19mm might be in direct competetion with the 20mm Pana but $199 vs. $359 is to consider an option.
The 30mm has its own range, it pairs with the 20mm better than the 25mm Panaleica at a fraction of the cost.
Picture quality is quite good since this lens is engineered for larger sensors.
On
http://www.pekkapotka.com/journal/2012/4...ex-dn.html
you can read a review of the 30mm.
I own it and I'm happy with it, but if some people need to drive a Ferrari as a ****-extension they may need stylish lenses, too. I like just to take nice pictures.... <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/cool.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='B)' />
Cheers,
Mike
Why bashing this lenses without having them tested?
Does a "stylish" lens automatically creates better pictures?
Do I take pictures of my camera with the lens attached or pictures with the camera and lens?
The 19mm might be in direct competetion with the 20mm Pana but $199 vs. $359 is to consider an option.
The 30mm has its own range, it pairs with the 20mm better than the 25mm Panaleica at a fraction of the cost.
Picture quality is quite good since this lens is engineered for larger sensors.
On
http://www.pekkapotka.com/journal/2012/4...ex-dn.html
you can read a review of the 30mm.
I own it and I'm happy with it, but if some people need to drive a Ferrari as a ****-extension they may need stylish lenses, too. I like just to take nice pictures.... <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/cool.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='B)' />
Cheers,
Mike