[dhazeghi]

[quote name='you2' timestamp='1326029252' post='14505']

Here is a test of the 35mm cz biogen on 5n and 7; raws can be downloaded:



http://www.bmupix.com/journal/2012/1/7/n...m-f20.html





Here is an interesting comparison of camera sizes; the 24f1.8 is kind of large:



http://www.bmupix.com/display/ShowImage?...4973287748

[/quote]



I must admit I didn't realize just how large the Sony 24/1.8 was, compared to the body. It seems strange that the bodies should be so compact and the lenses should be disproportionately large.



The Zeiss 35/2 looks good at f/4, but f/2 is pretty unimpressive. Still, $1k on a MF lens is less than appealing. That's a focal length where AF would actually be useful, especially at wide apertures.



It's a peculiar situation - great body, but very non-obvious choices for suitable lenses. Perhaps Sony spent all their R&D money on the body and had nothing left when it came to lenses?



Thanks,



DH