Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 USM L IS II vs Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 USM L IS
Hello !


I have CANON 6D 


I want to change may  Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 USM L IS for Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 USM L IS II


The difference between the 2 lenses and many or there are different differences


Well, I guess we do not understand the question ... these are two very different lenses. Both are pretty awesome.

Hello !
Thanks for replying
My own and a simple question I possess the 70-300 L of the canon and I read that the 70-200 f2.8 L II and the milgior telephoto Canon (even your site considers it as excellent)
My question and great difference between clarity between the 2 lenses simply need to change Canon EF 70-300mm f / 4-5.6 USM L IS with the Canon EF 70-200mm f / 2.8 USM L IS II
Thank you
If you don't need the extra 100mm reach and don't mind the extra weight an size of 70-200f2.8 then this lens is a sure bet, it will never disappoint you. You can always get a 1.4 teleconverter and have 280mm f4 or 2X and have 400mmf5.6.

Optically speaking Canon 70-200f2.8 is a well known excellent piece of gear.

Would the upgrade be beneficial for you? Only you can decide.
I suppose that I would rather decide between the 70-200mm and the 100-400mm.

The 70-200mm is fast and the 100-400mm is long whereas the 70-300mm is neither.

I wouldn't worry about quality - these are all top notch lenses.

I'm not a big fan of tele converters (for the 70-200mm) - why take an awesome lens and transform it into something ordinary.

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)