Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Samsung NX lenses are weird ...
#14
[quote name='Sathe Wild' timestamp='1322165022' post='13217']

How are you making that statement? Have you tested 5n?

[/quote]



Well, I used the GH-2, NEX 5, NX200. The NEX 5n is not substantially different from the 5 in anything but the sensor itself.

I would already prefer the 5 over the NX200 so I think it is valid to conclude that the 5n is no worse. That said the NX200 is certainly "good enough" for most users anyway.





As far as the system is concerned - I think it's obvious that MFT has substantially more accessories, specifically lenses. Just take e.g. ultra wide and long tele zoom options. MFT has multiple - NX, NEX, N1 have none at all.
  


Messages In This Thread
Samsung NX lenses are weird ... - by Klaus - 11-22-2011, 07:28 PM
Samsung NX lenses are weird ... - by noblegas - 11-23-2011, 01:05 PM
Samsung NX lenses are weird ... - by Klaus - 11-23-2011, 01:25 PM
Samsung NX lenses are weird ... - by Klaus - 11-23-2011, 09:51 PM
Samsung NX lenses are weird ... - by noblegas - 11-24-2011, 07:44 AM
Samsung NX lenses are weird ... - by marschiert bunt - 11-24-2011, 09:14 AM
Samsung NX lenses are weird ... - by Klaus - 11-24-2011, 09:38 AM
Samsung NX lenses are weird ... - by Guest - 11-24-2011, 11:20 AM
Samsung NX lenses are weird ... - by Klaus - 11-24-2011, 12:03 PM
Samsung NX lenses are weird ... - by Guest - 11-24-2011, 01:51 PM
Samsung NX lenses are weird ... - by Guest - 11-24-2011, 08:03 PM
Samsung NX lenses are weird ... - by popo - 11-24-2011, 08:59 PM
Samsung NX lenses are weird ... - by mst - 11-24-2011, 09:10 PM
Samsung NX lenses are weird ... - by Klaus - 11-24-2011, 09:18 PM
Samsung NX lenses are weird ... - by youpii - 11-25-2011, 10:24 PM
Samsung NX lenses are weird ... - by Klaus - 11-25-2011, 10:30 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)