[IanCD]

[quote name='Studor13' timestamp='1320962736' post='12841']

I see. So you say that if Markus tests a lens and get X but a guy from a link that this other guy - not me - provided gets Y, then somehow if Markus tests another lens and still gets X then the guy who got Y is wrong and that what I say carrys no weight? Is this right?



There are all sorts of 'scientific' tests being done out there. Someone recently claimed that something goes faster than light.



If and when I send the 'wonder' lens and Markus 'shows' that his original results stands, do I look "silly" because you say so?



Shall I show you some of the "silly" shots I've made with this 1-star lens?



I used the 18-55 II for a while and the 18-70 for quite sometime (both are reputed to have higher resolution numbers) before realizing that the 'wonder' lens is just better. I didn't need resolution numbers from PZ to work this out.



As I have said, there are a number of things that make a lens stand out and can not be measured. It's clear that you sit around waiting for a bunch of numbers and go "Oh yes, this lens is good, that is crap". You need to get out and shoot and work it out yourself.

[/quote]



Hi Studor,

Don't you realise? You're not going to change anyone's mind with more argument... just wind people up...

Best let this lie, send Markus the lens, then pick it up from there. Let's see how your lens tests.