[miro]

As expected another superachromat.



http://www.lenstip.com/318.5-Lens_review...ation.html

[Guest]

Its a tad soft wide open and has a bit of vignetting but otherwise (based on test results) looks like a really nice lens.

[mst]

[quote name='miro' timestamp='1316518763' post='11663']

As expected another superachromat.

[/quote]



Honestly: I didn't expect it.



-- Markus

[youpii]

[quote name='mst' timestamp='1316524742' post='11665']

Honestly: I didn't expect it.



-- Markus

[/quote]



Will you test it?

I think you also didn't test the 105 VR in FF.

[mst]

[quote name='youpii' timestamp='1317038289' post='11858']

Will you test it?

[/quote]



Yep. Got it last week.



[quote name='youpii' timestamp='1317038289' post='11858']

I think you also didn't test the 105 VR in FF.

[/quote]



I did, test will be published after the AF-S 17-35 (which is the next FX review).



-- Markus

[mst]

"Look Mom, no LoCAs!"







Well, almost. There are some minor traces left in 100% view and I'm sure they could be emphasized with really nasty light, but for everyday use, the lens is free of bokeh fringing.



-- Markus