09-13-2011, 11:14 AM
[quote name='PuxaVida' timestamp='1315912228' post='11544']
Interesting... and only for 16mm FL we can see that odd result... For example @20mm wide open, corners are worse than f/5.6 - 8 interval (as expected).
This can be clearly seen by checking the "global map" / corners... Do they have an explanation for that?
[/quote]
No. but it certainly is no error as the results have been online almost two years now. Plus, if you look at others of their lens tests you find similar oddities. It may be that they use a weird line chart, or measure resolution colour specific or something else.Therfore you probably cant say that the measurments are wrong as such. They are just not practically relevant, as your pics will look the opposite.
Interesting... and only for 16mm FL we can see that odd result... For example @20mm wide open, corners are worse than f/5.6 - 8 interval (as expected).
This can be clearly seen by checking the "global map" / corners... Do they have an explanation for that?
[/quote]
No. but it certainly is no error as the results have been online almost two years now. Plus, if you look at others of their lens tests you find similar oddities. It may be that they use a weird line chart, or measure resolution colour specific or something else.Therfore you probably cant say that the measurments are wrong as such. They are just not practically relevant, as your pics will look the opposite.