Posts: 7,954
Threads: 1,831
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
45
[url="http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/newproduct/20110906_475397.html"]http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/newproduct/20110906_475397.html[/url]
Posts: 1,340
Threads: 55
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
0
Looks within expectations to me. Their processing is less aggressive than Sony's so gives more detail but it isn't like bigger sensor potential.
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.
Posts: 6,716
Threads: 236
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
25
ISO 800 and 1600: Very impressive results for such a tiny sensor. Possibly better than I get with my 450D <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' /> . Camera + lens look a bit silly, though.
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1315259423' post='11328']
ISO 800 and 1600: Very impressive results for such a tiny sensor. [/quote]
+1
