Hello there, first time poster here.
Just wanted to ask if there's going to be a FF test of the original Sigma 12-24 in the foreseeable future so that people might know if the new one is worth buying over the old one. No matter which mount actually, might just as well use a Nikon mount one - I remember that the EF mount sample tested on APS-C was not as good as Sony and Nikon ones.
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1315127184' post='11295']
The Sigma 8mm f/4.5 EX circular fisheye costs 800EUR locally. It is slightly slower and not much cheaper than the Canon which offers a full frame fish-eye and weather protection on top.
[/quote]
I thought it's actually f/3.5???
http://www.dyxum.com/lenses/Sigma-Fishey...ns327.html
There was an older f/4 DG (and another non-DG) version, but of course they've been discontinued.
Just wanted to ask if there's going to be a FF test of the original Sigma 12-24 in the foreseeable future so that people might know if the new one is worth buying over the old one. No matter which mount actually, might just as well use a Nikon mount one - I remember that the EF mount sample tested on APS-C was not as good as Sony and Nikon ones.
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1315127184' post='11295']
The Sigma 8mm f/4.5 EX circular fisheye costs 800EUR locally. It is slightly slower and not much cheaper than the Canon which offers a full frame fish-eye and weather protection on top.
[/quote]
I thought it's actually f/3.5???
http://www.dyxum.com/lenses/Sigma-Fishey...ns327.html
There was an older f/4 DG (and another non-DG) version, but of course they've been discontinued.