Posts: 7,992
Threads: 1,849
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
48
Weak at f/2.8, very decent at medium apertures. Prone to centering issues it seems.
[url="http://www.opticallimits.com/sonyalphaff/661-sony2875f28"]http://www.opticallimits.com/sonyalphaff/661-sony2875f28[/url]
Posts: 442
Threads: 25
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
1
Thanks. But you already tested the Tamron, did you think the Sony version had improvements?
Posts: 7,992
Threads: 1,849
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
48
Well, no, I didn't expect any improvement but it was still necessary to test it. Many users just do not know that it is basically a Tamron lens,
Posts: 7,992
Threads: 1,849
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
48
[quote name='youpii' timestamp='1310851337' post='10081']
BTW, for Sony FF, some resolution charts go up to 3600, some other to 3500. It's slightly misleading. And none has the Poor/Fair etc scale like Nikon.
[/quote]
That's a caching issue in your browser. They are all at 3600 now.
Posts: 442
Threads: 25
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
1
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1310877246' post='10082']
That's a caching issue in your browser. They are all at 3600 now.
[/quote]
After refresh, they all show 3600 now, except the 28-75.
Posts: 7,992
Threads: 1,849
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
48
[quote name='youpii' timestamp='1310898810' post='10092']
After refresh, they all show 3600 now, except the 28-75.
[/quote]
Oh, you're right. My error. Sorry.
Posts: 7,992
Threads: 1,849
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
48
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1310903169' post='10095']
Oh, you're right. My error. Sorry.
[/quote]
Fixed