07-16-2011, 09:12 PM
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1310849227' post='10078']
Well, no, I didn't expect any improvement but it was still necessary to test it. Many users just do not know that it is basically a Tamron lens,
[/quote]
OK <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
I think you should also mention the [url="http://www.dyxum.com/lenses/Minolta-AF-28-75-F2.8-D_lens33.html"]KM 28-75/2.8[/url] in the introduction. It's basically the same lens without SAM.
Well, no, I didn't expect any improvement but it was still necessary to test it. Many users just do not know that it is basically a Tamron lens,
[/quote]
OK <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
I think you should also mention the [url="http://www.dyxum.com/lenses/Minolta-AF-28-75-F2.8-D_lens33.html"]KM 28-75/2.8[/url] in the introduction. It's basically the same lens without SAM.