07-01-2011, 08:38 AM
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1309501821' post='9669']
I wouldn't. A 300mm equiv lens on a FF mirrorless is still gigantic. The whole size argument is obsolete then.
A Leica 135mm f/3.4 is just as heavy and big as a similar DSLR lens.
If you're still interested you just need to wait for the rumored Sony SLT FF body.
[/quote]
Hmmm? The Sony SLT will not exactlyt be mirrorless <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />... so also not more compact due to missing mirror box.
I just want a compact FF body, say size of EOS 600D/5100D. Not sure why I would want a mirrorless full frame body
I wouldn't. A 300mm equiv lens on a FF mirrorless is still gigantic. The whole size argument is obsolete then.
A Leica 135mm f/3.4 is just as heavy and big as a similar DSLR lens.
If you're still interested you just need to wait for the rumored Sony SLT FF body.
[/quote]
Hmmm? The Sony SLT will not exactlyt be mirrorless <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />... so also not more compact due to missing mirror box.
I just want a compact FF body, say size of EOS 600D/5100D. Not sure why I would want a mirrorless full frame body