06-01-2011, 10:08 AM
[quote name='PuxaVida' timestamp='1306906629' post='8974']
Might be a better choice... But bear in mind that FF bodies require high quality UWA's than the APS-Cs <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />....
[/quote]
That is not based on much <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />....
You can get great results with a bargain basement Tokina 19-35mm.
While you do get more barrel distortion, usually, on FF, you get a higher resolution too with the current sensors, and so the distortion correction resolution hit will not be that severe.
And on vignetting/light fall off, you can't combat that with higher quality UWA's, as it is sensor related.
FF will give better "dynamic" (not dynamic range, but dynamic feel) quality anyway....
Might be a better choice... But bear in mind that FF bodies require high quality UWA's than the APS-Cs <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />....[/quote]
That is not based on much <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />....You can get great results with a bargain basement Tokina 19-35mm.
While you do get more barrel distortion, usually, on FF, you get a higher resolution too with the current sensors, and so the distortion correction resolution hit will not be that severe.
And on vignetting/light fall off, you can't combat that with higher quality UWA's, as it is sensor related.
FF will give better "dynamic" (not dynamic range, but dynamic feel) quality anyway....