05-21-2011, 10:30 PM
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1305981407' post='8726']
No, what you are writing is nonsense.
EITHER you test out\r visual system (how we perceive red (66% less bright, by the way) compared to white,
OR you test the actual information being captured of a red subject by Bayer CFA sensors.
You did do neither, but mostly the test was of the 1st type, nothing about the 2nd type.
Why I don't do it is because it is bullshit, what you say you are testing. It is a nonsense test which does not hold up in any way.
So, device a better test to actually test the detail recovery of a red/blue/green subject, and a good way to actually evaluate the detail (so, without our eyes being the ones tested).
[/quote]
Lol, the apparently the sheer irony of the situation just slipped past you <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
I’m talking about the recent argument regarding Sony’s SLT focus tracking, where you were clinging to your own test results and opponent was disimissing them as funny - now look how things have reversed <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' />
The thing is that I have done at least some tests to back my claims up, while yours are backed by lots of hot air. Unfortunatelly “bullshit†and “nonsense†don’t have lots of weight as an argument, even if you repeat them a few times in a row.
Anyway – Bjoern – many thanks for that link to dpreview test (http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sigmadp1/page20.asp), that’s exactly the thing I was going to do on Monday – print and shoot some different colour resolution charts. Now it just saved my time <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
Specifically for Brightcolours: check that blue-and-red part of high resolution files – sigma’s 4.7 mp sensor easily outresolved D60’s 10 mp and that 100% proves what I was trying to get throught to you. From my side the case is closed, I don’t think any additional test could yield any more proof to that.
No, what you are writing is nonsense.
EITHER you test out\r visual system (how we perceive red (66% less bright, by the way) compared to white,
OR you test the actual information being captured of a red subject by Bayer CFA sensors.
You did do neither, but mostly the test was of the 1st type, nothing about the 2nd type.
Why I don't do it is because it is bullshit, what you say you are testing. It is a nonsense test which does not hold up in any way.
So, device a better test to actually test the detail recovery of a red/blue/green subject, and a good way to actually evaluate the detail (so, without our eyes being the ones tested).
[/quote]
Lol, the apparently the sheer irony of the situation just slipped past you <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> I’m talking about the recent argument regarding Sony’s SLT focus tracking, where you were clinging to your own test results and opponent was disimissing them as funny - now look how things have reversed <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' />
The thing is that I have done at least some tests to back my claims up, while yours are backed by lots of hot air. Unfortunatelly “bullshit†and “nonsense†don’t have lots of weight as an argument, even if you repeat them a few times in a row.
Anyway – Bjoern – many thanks for that link to dpreview test (http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sigmadp1/page20.asp), that’s exactly the thing I was going to do on Monday – print and shoot some different colour resolution charts. Now it just saved my time <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> Specifically for Brightcolours: check that blue-and-red part of high resolution files – sigma’s 4.7 mp sensor easily outresolved D60’s 10 mp and that 100% proves what I was trying to get throught to you. From my side the case is closed, I don’t think any additional test could yield any more proof to that.